Sunday, January 2, 2011
Another Comment from Reader
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "Comment from Reader:":
The comment is good reason why Emery, Saxton should not let the public see the clear photo til science has a chance to authenticate it. It will surly be called a hoax like the PG film without more sound evidence with it. It wouldn't make no difference how clear it was, people would surly say someone is inside the suit like before in Bluff Creek.
____________
Thank you for your comment. ... LNP
The comment is good reason why Emery, Saxton should not let the public see the clear photo til science has a chance to authenticate it. It will surly be called a hoax like the PG film without more sound evidence with it. It wouldn't make no difference how clear it was, people would surly say someone is inside the suit like before in Bluff Creek.
____________
Thank you for your comment. ... LNP
Comment from Reader:
Ellis has left a new comment on your post "Guest Editor-Blogger:":
Sometimes fiction wins over facts. Fact is getting a good view of the Sasquatch would be a feat for sure. These animals are very smart and know that humans pose a threat to them. People also assume these beings do not communicate with others of their species. On the contrary, many people have reported them doing so. They may not have language such as humans do but beating on tree stumps, clapping rocks is also a known form of communication.
The picture was taken at after dark and before dawn according to Emery. This means any movement of the camera or movement of the Sasquatch will result in blurring. If you notice the Bigfoot videos on YouTube major blurring in video cameras is common because of constant movement and non-auto focus lens. This is a major reason it takes lots of money to produce a clear film.
The Patterson film has been re framed over a thousand times to get it to where it is today. The picture of Clyde shows me that the lens was out of focus because of the wavy nature of the stump in the background. Many have ridiculed the photo as sheer mush but fail to realize the complexity of even getting that shot. They have never said that they could have done it better. Remember every time someone takes a picture of Sasquatch the being is not posing for a camera.
Frank is right when he said lighting can have deadly results for the person who is near the beast when the flash goes off. We just don't know how these beings will react to it. If were waiting for a clear movie shot of Bigfoot we will have a long wait. These beings have remained hidden from science for thousands of years.
____________
Thank you for such an in depth comment. It gives us much to think about. ... LNP
Sometimes fiction wins over facts. Fact is getting a good view of the Sasquatch would be a feat for sure. These animals are very smart and know that humans pose a threat to them. People also assume these beings do not communicate with others of their species. On the contrary, many people have reported them doing so. They may not have language such as humans do but beating on tree stumps, clapping rocks is also a known form of communication.
The picture was taken at after dark and before dawn according to Emery. This means any movement of the camera or movement of the Sasquatch will result in blurring. If you notice the Bigfoot videos on YouTube major blurring in video cameras is common because of constant movement and non-auto focus lens. This is a major reason it takes lots of money to produce a clear film.
The Patterson film has been re framed over a thousand times to get it to where it is today. The picture of Clyde shows me that the lens was out of focus because of the wavy nature of the stump in the background. Many have ridiculed the photo as sheer mush but fail to realize the complexity of even getting that shot. They have never said that they could have done it better. Remember every time someone takes a picture of Sasquatch the being is not posing for a camera.
Frank is right when he said lighting can have deadly results for the person who is near the beast when the flash goes off. We just don't know how these beings will react to it. If were waiting for a clear movie shot of Bigfoot we will have a long wait. These beings have remained hidden from science for thousands of years.
____________
Thank you for such an in depth comment. It gives us much to think about. ... LNP
Guest Editor-Blogger:
Frank has left a new comment on your post "Newspaper Column, A MATTER OF TIME":
I think you're right on! Blurry pictures of bigfoot are a fact of shooting photos. People that have never done so need to understand that out in the forest especially at night is difficult at best to get any animal in clear view. The very nature of the surroundings make it almost impossible to obtain a clear shot. Shadows, brush, plants and humidity will all make these shots blurry. Then you have a creature that is moving. With all of that the blurry pic of Clyde is not bad. Using light can make them even more unreasonably blurred. Over the years I have never got a good shot at anything after dark. I think the ESP team were extremely lucky not to have been attacked by this thing.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
